Health
Should Hospitals Be Held Responsible for Health Risks Like Radiation Exposure to Staff?

Should Hospitals Be Held Responsible for Health Risks Like Radiation Exposure to Staff?
Here’s The Scoop
In a concerning development at a Boston-area hospital, at least five nurses working on the same floor have been diagnosed with brain tumors, raising alarm bells and prompting a call for answers. The Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA) is standing firmly behind the nurses at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, particularly those on the 5th floor maternity unit, as they seek clarity on these serious medical concerns.
The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. Nurses, their families, and patients are understandably anxious about potential health risks. The MNA is committed to an independent, scientific investigation to get to the bottom of these diagnoses, a process that is already underway but may take several weeks to complete.
The nurses’ union has been inundated with over 300 responses from current and former hospital employees, highlighting widespread health concerns. This isn’t just a local issue; similar cases have been reported elsewhere, such as the 105 people diagnosed with rare cancers linked to a New Jersey high school, underscoring a growing national concern.
Newton-Wellesley Hospital conducted its own review, interviewing 11 staff members from the fifth floor. Their findings suggested that five cases were benign brain tumors of three different types, while the other six were unrelated health issues. The hospital claims no environmental risks were found that could be linked to these tumors.
However, the hospital’s internal investigation has not put everyone at ease. The MNA argues that the hospital’s environmental testing was not comprehensive, and they are determined to ensure a thorough and transparent investigation. They stress that the hospital cannot simply dismiss these concerns with predetermined conclusions.
Radiation exposure is another concern, as 668 X-rays were performed on the fifth floor between 2020 and 2024, potentially doubling the risk for nurses. Yet, the hospital insists that appropriate safety techniques minimize exposure risks.
As this situation unfolds, the health and wellbeing of the hospital’s staff and patients remain a top priority. The MNA is committed to supporting the nurses at Newton-Wellesley and ensuring that their concerns are addressed with the seriousness they deserve. This is a developing story that underscores the need for transparency and accountability in our healthcare institutions.
What do you think? Let us know by participating in our poll, or join the discussion in the comment section below!

Jerry C.
April 23, 2025 at 7:31 am
Only if the hospital fails standard safety protocols. Exposure within acceptable limits is something one accedes to when taking those jobs. Excessive exposure is more often than not due to lax observations of prophylactic standards on the part of the affected employees (in other word, most of the time they bring it on themselves). Hospitals can only be held liable when they are negligent.
You don’t take a job as a bareback ‘ho’ and sue when you catch a dose of the clap.
Dave
April 23, 2025 at 7:41 am
It should be pretty obvious that there is some sort of safety concern in this situation
Steve
April 23, 2025 at 10:36 am
MRNA COVID-19 vaccines (which were required for continued employment) would be more likely culprits.
Tom
April 27, 2025 at 6:28 am
Steve 100%
Jerry C.
May 15, 2025 at 4:34 pm
You failed biology in high school, didn’t you? Did you even go to high school?