Politics
Do You Agree Racism and Misogyny Cost Harris the Election?
Do You Agree Racism and Misogyny Cost Harris the Election?
Here’s The Scoop
In a recent appearance on “The View,” House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., took a stand against the narrative that “racism and misogyny” were the primary reasons behind President-elect Trump’s victory over Vice President Kamala Harris. While some in his party continue to point fingers and play the blame game, Jeffries highlighted a more pressing issue that resonates with many Americans: the economy.
When asked by co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin about the lessons Democrats should learn from this election, Jeffries emphasized that the high cost of living has become a significant burden for Americans, making the American dream seem unattainable for many. He argued that this is not a partisan issue but an American one that needs to be addressed collectively.
Co-host Sunny Hostin expressed her disbelief over voters choosing Trump over Harris, questioning if racism and sexism played a role. Jeffries, however, remained focused on the economic factors, noting that the election results indicated a shift in support even within communities of color, moving away from the Democratic candidate.
Jeffries acknowledged the disappointment felt by many but pointed out that the economy was the dominant factor influencing voters. He recognized that while Harris represented hope for a new era, the reality of economic struggles took precedence in the minds of many Americans.
Meanwhile, Hostin continued to argue that racism and sexism were significant contributors to Harris’ defeat, citing a “clear racial divide” in voting patterns. She insisted that these uncomfortable truths about the country need to be acknowledged, despite the backlash her views have received.
This discussion underscores the ongoing debate within the Democratic Party about the reasons behind their electoral losses and highlights the importance of addressing economic concerns that affect all Americans, regardless of race or gender. As the nation moves forward, it’s crucial for leaders to focus on policies that will alleviate the economic pressures facing everyday citizens, rather than getting bogged down in divisive rhetoric.
What do you think? Let us know by participating in our poll, or join the discussion in the comment section below!
Jerry Hibberd
November 28, 2024 at 7:30 am
Candidates that are selected as figureheads become obvious to the voting public for lack of knowledge or concern for the public they are trying to influence or supposedly serve.
Americans are more observant and intelligent than political machines using tactics not principals to gather support for a puppet candidate!
Robert H Quinter Jr
November 28, 2024 at 8:39 am
The electorate is concerned that the government provides an opportunity for a comfortable lifestyle without undo interference in day-to-day activities. Harris’s participation and support of the Biden administration’s which intrude into every aspect of life and increase the daily costs of life made her an unacceptable candidate.
Robert Quinter
November 28, 2024 at 8:43 am
The electorate is concerned that the government provides an opportunity for a comfortable lifestyle without undo interference in day-to-day activities. Harris’s participation and support of the Biden administration’s programs and policies which intrude into every aspect of life and increase the daily costs made her an unacceptable candidate. She provided no path for enhanced lifestyles and failed to voice her policies.
Mike
November 28, 2024 at 9:28 am
Her racism, misandry, her DIVERSITY INCLUSION EQUITY aka D.I.E., pushing the woke transgender onto our kids, her cackling word salads with no clear policy other than open border, get rid of guns, and mutilating our kids cost her the election
Matt
November 28, 2024 at 3:40 pm
Stupidity, bad management, policy history and word salads cost her the election.
Jerry C.
November 28, 2024 at 3:44 pm
No, certainly not. I will concede that there were some people who wouldn’t vote for Harris because of her sex or because of her race but would posit that their numbers were far less than those who voted FOR her ONLY because of her sex or her race, with the highest concentrations likely around universities.
Geolyn
November 29, 2024 at 11:15 am
I do not believe that racism and sexism were the cause of her defeat. I believe that she was not a good candidate, as she just followed her marching orders not to reveal her policies at any cost since the American people would never agree with them. That is why, in my opinion, she danced around and flip-flopped on her policies. The only way she could accomplish this was to serve up her word salads, or just not put herself in any positions where she would have to reveal what she intended to do — especially not going on Joe Rogan for any length of time, not appearing with Donald Trump on any level, etc., etc., etc. She was not capable of doing very much for our country. (Even her staff could not take her abusive, controlling personality).