Connect with us

Domestic Policy

Do You Agree with Mayor Rex Parris’s Approach to Solving Homelessness by Offering Fentanyl?

Do You Agree with Mayor Rex Parris’s Approach to Solving Homelessness by Offering Fentanyl?

Here’s The Scoop

In a bold and controversial move, Lancaster Mayor R. Rex Parris has stirred up a storm by suggesting a radical approach to tackling the city’s homelessness crisis. During a recent city council meeting, the Republican mayor proposed offering free fentanyl to homeless individuals, a statement that has sparked both outrage and a recall effort.

Parris, known for his unorthodox methods, made the comments in response to a resident’s inquiry about the city’s plan to consolidate the homeless population into a single encampment on an abandoned golf course. The mayor, unflinching in his stance, reiterated his desire to provide the potent opioid to those living on the streets.

Despite criticism, Parris remains unapologetic, clarifying that his remarks targeted the criminal elements within the homeless population—individuals he claims are responsible for a significant portion of local crime, including robberies and violent offenses. While he did not provide specific data to support these claims, his comments reflect a growing frustration among residents who feel unsafe in their own neighborhoods.

The recall effort against Parris has gained some traction, though it remains far from its goal. Critics accuse him of prioritizing personal gain and enacting controversial policies, but his supporters argue that his tough stance is necessary to protect law-abiding citizens.

Parris has been a vocal advocate for innovative solutions to the homelessness crisis, suggesting that a federal “purge” might be necessary to address the issue effectively. He acknowledges the harshness of his proposals but insists that his primary duty is to safeguard the community.

Having served as mayor since 2008, Parris is no stranger to controversy. In 2018, he proposed banning neckties in workplace dress codes, citing health concerns. His leadership style, characterized by bold and sometimes divisive measures, continues to spark debate about the best path forward for Lancaster.

As the city grapples with these challenges, the mayor’s comments have ignited a broader conversation about how to balance compassion with public safety—a debate that resonates far beyond the borders of Lancaster.

What do you think? Let us know by participating in our poll, or join the discussion in the comment section below!


Source

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Don

    April 25, 2025 at 6:52 am

    That’s about as stupid as one can get.

  2. Dave

    April 25, 2025 at 7:11 am

    We need to bring back sanitariums

  3. Just saying

    April 25, 2025 at 8:25 am

    This just confirms how sadistic our politicians truly are! Depopulation agenda is screaming loud and clear!

  4. Joan

    April 25, 2025 at 9:32 am

    A church in my area was giving syringes and needles to the homeless. It was so they wouldn’t use dirty needles. When the emcampment was moved, most of the syringes and needles were found on the ground never having been opened. You can’t help those people. I know that from personal experience. They have to really want to get better, but most of them never hit that point. They die first.

  5. Jerry C.

    April 25, 2025 at 11:47 am

    That would likely only result in 10%-15% of them self-eliminating-by-accidental-OD – hardly a dent in the total population…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *