Politics
Should the Army Revert Military Base Names Back to Original Despite Confederate Ties?
Should the Army Revert Military Base Names Back to Original Despite Confederate Ties?
Here’s The Scoop
In a move that underscores a return to tradition and a nod to true American heroes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the renaming of the Columbus, Georgia military post back to Fort Benning. This decision comes as part of a broader initiative to dismantle the Biden administration’s controversial efforts to rename military installations in the wake of the 2020 George Floyd protests.
The installation, which trains all of the U.S. Army’s infantry and armor soldiers, will now honor Cpl. Fred G. Benning, a World War I hero who earned the Distinguished Service Cross for his extraordinary bravery in France in 1918. This change marks a significant shift away from the previous namesake, Confederate Gen. Henry L. Benning, and aligns with the Trump administration’s commitment to honoring those who exemplify American valor and sacrifice.
Hegseth’s decision mirrors a similar move earlier this year when he directed Fort Liberty to revert to its original name, Fort Bragg. The base was initially named after Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg, but now honors Pfc. Roland L. Bragg, a World War II hero recognized for his courage during the Battle of the Bulge.
Fort Benning has long been a cornerstone of the Army’s training operations, hosting the elite Army Ranger School and basic training for soldiers. The renaming to Fort Moore under the previous administration was part of a broader effort to erase Confederate history, a move that many saw as an unnecessary capitulation to a politically motivated agenda.
The original Fort Moore name paid tribute to Lt. Gen. Hal Moore and his wife Julia, both of whom made significant contributions to military service and family advocacy. While their legacy will still be honored, the return to Fort Benning emphasizes a focus on celebrating those who have directly impacted military history through their heroism on the battlefield.
This decision by Hegseth is a clear message that the current administration values the traditions and history that have long defined America’s military institutions. By honoring true American heroes like Cpl. Fred G. Benning and Pfc. Roland L. Bragg, the military is reaffirming its commitment to the values of courage, honor, and patriotism that resonate deeply with the American people.
What do you think? Let us know by participating in our poll, or join the discussion in the comment section below!
Dave
March 6, 2025 at 8:12 am
We need to embrace our history and culture so we can learn from them whether they are good or bad. Changing name doesn’t mean anything
Don
March 6, 2025 at 11:22 am
That’s nothing but childish BS.
Gary H Riggs
March 6, 2025 at 11:23 am
Finally, folks with courage and respect for our heritage as Americans!
Keeping the familiar names of these installations denotes continuity and stability which are sorely needed in our present fast-paced world.
So creative and positive to honor modern-day heroes. Hopefully, this will show the continuity of “duty, honor, country” for generations to come.
For those who consider our Confederate brothers to be traitors, know that they did NOT advocate overthrowing the government of the United States. The separate states left the Union formally, by secession, and formed The Confederate States of America, with its own constitution.
Shame on our recent leadership for perpetuating the inflammatory , false and misleading lie that the confederates were traitors. Of course,
Obama and company used this slanderous lie in order to vilify the South, justify the destruction of Southern history, further divide our Country, excuse the destruction and lawlessness of the “mostly peaceful” demonstrations and continue the march toward Marxism.
Thank God for His intervention at this time! Let us pray for strength to rescue our Country and be, once again, “one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”.
Big Frank
March 6, 2025 at 5:47 pm
why spent $$ to change the names back. What done is done. Government waste
Nick Drabin
March 6, 2025 at 8:47 pm
DAMN !!!
I DO BELIEVE “BIG FRANK” IS ACTUALLY A ” LITTLE WIENER ” !!!
OR SHOULD I SAY “WINER” !!!
Lynn Anderson
March 7, 2025 at 5:44 am
Changing the names back to the original is a correct move but they still erased the historical intent of naming the bases for brave Confederate soldiers by finding some other soldiers with the same names who fought in a different war. The Civil War is a moment in history that can never be erased and soldiers from the south fought bravely too and were Americans. As much as I like Pete Hegseth, he should have just changed the names back to the originals offering no explanations but instead he copped out.
Dewayne Imsandg
March 7, 2025 at 8:04 am
Changing the name of Fort Bragg was an idiotic decision. Idiots cost money – get rid of the idiots and save all kinds of money.
huffman king
March 7, 2025 at 9:22 pm
Go back to the old names. I served 32 years in the military and I would like to remember all those Army bases as I know them. Renaming them is a bunch of B.S. especially for the reason given.